Tuesday, January 10, 2012

1984 Fishbowl/Liveblog -end Per. 2

175 comments:

  1. @ Class
    Would you have grown to love Big Brother if you were in Winston's place?

    ReplyDelete
  2. What did you guys think of the ending of the book?

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Class
    Why did Winston betray Julia in Room 101?

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Gabe
    That's a hard question. He was tortured, so I can see why. Also, I never really thought that he was dedicated to rebelling.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ Class

    Do you guys think there is a connection between the way prisoners are treated and tortured in today's society?

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Reid
    Winston didn't love Julia and he was tortured and probably want her so suffer too.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Reid

    Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. Whatever your greatest fear is. If breaks you completely to the point of loving big brother.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Reid

    I think that Winston knew that he didn't feel the same for Julia anymore and decided to face what he felt and save himself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Personally, I find Julia to be a horrible person, but so is Winston. They both were willing to inflict pain on the other, and that shows that perhaps they never really truly loved each other.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Reid
    Because he was faced with "the worst thing in the world", something that he couldn't withstand. At that moment he was so terrified that nothing else mattered to him except getting away from the rats.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Gabe
    I don't think I could love Big Brother after what the government did that stuff to me. I would have a huge grudge. However I would be scared to hate Big Brother.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Class What are your thoughts on the book’s ending?

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Gabe:
    No way. I think it would be better to die than give some opressive government everything. Then again, it's hard to face your greatest fear. It's easy to SAY you will be strong enough, but I don't think you will really know if you would be until you are actually in that situation.

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Gabe
    I think that it depends on how strong the person is. Unless you are determined in your motives, being tortured would probably slowly break people down enough to the point where they do whatever they are told.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Reid
    She probably betrayed him because she didn't want to deal with all of the pain herself. She wanted anyone but herself to have the pain.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Gabe
    I would like to say no way! However, being in that kind of circumstance might cause me to do something insane like that. It's hard to know what I would do if the government pushed me to that kind of extreme.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Class
    What do you all think about the ending and how Winston now loves Big Brother?

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Arman
    I dont think there is an intentional connection. There may be a small hint of connection, but I don't think it is to this extreme and I think Orwell meant this to be a prediction and not a comparison.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Class
    If they knew what Winston was thinking all along, why didn't they just kill him in the beginning? Does this happen to everyone?

    ReplyDelete
  20. @ Gabe

    I would love to say that I wouldn't. That I would stay strong and keep saying to myself 2+2=4. But if it came down to the torture that Winston faced, yeah, I'm gonna give in. At my core, or in my subconscious, I would hate Big Brother, but I would lie enough to myself just enough, to be able to earn the "privilege" get shot.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @ inner circle
    Why do you think O'Brien stopped torturing Winston for a while when he still had feelings for Julia?

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Arman


    I really hope not. It would be horrible if in today's society we had a "Room 101," or anything like it.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @ Gabe
    I hate to say it, but I think that if I had been that tortured and that mislead for that long, I would eventually come to love Big Brother as Winston did. However, I am not sure it would have been real love, but I might have acted like I loved Big Brother just to put me out of my misery.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Gabe- I would like to think that I would continue to hate Big Brother. I think that while I might have said that I loved Big Brother, I would go home and remember what they did to me, and I would probably still hate him, although I would be more cautious.

    But really, since I have never gone through torture, I can't say....

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Arman

    Orwell likely over exaggerated torture in prisons for 1984. It's not that horrid. Close, but not as horrific as the ministry of love's tortures.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Reid
    He was so terrified of Big Brother and realized that his life was more important than Julia's. It shows how influential Big Brother is.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @ Reid

    Winston was trying to not do that at the beginning, but as it went on, he couldn't take the pain anymore, and he just caved and completely betrayed Julia and the rest of the brotherhood.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Reid Winston betrayed Julia because of self-preservation. The instinct of saving himself over others kicked in. It is a perfectly normal instinct.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Arman
    I think everyone feels trapped at some point of their life. Internally or literally externally. Either way, I would agree that sometimes people use similar tactics towards prisoners.

    ReplyDelete
  30. @Gabe
    Everyone is seeming to say no way, but they aren't really thinking that if they went through all of the pain and torture that Winston had to go through, wouldn't they too do anything that they could in order to make all of the tireless pain cease to exist with themselves? I wouldn't want to give in and begin to love Big Brother but...

    ReplyDelete
  31. @ Arman
    I don't see any connection whatsoever between the wat prisoners are treated. Years ago there was the electric chair, but that killed people. Now, if you refuse to tell the truth, they don't use torture(at least in the U.S.) to squeeze the facts out of you.

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Inner Circle:
    Do you think that the government doesn't want bad thoughts out in the universe? Or what are their motives in making everyone loyal before they die?

    ReplyDelete
  33. @class - Why did they torture Winston to the brink of death, but refused to kill him until they 'cured' him? I understood a lot of the government's thinking about how to endure as leaders, but I didn't understand this. He'll never have existed anyway, so why?

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Class
    Why do you think that Winston is completely okay with getting shot in the back even after he has been "cured" by the government?

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Class

    What do you think of O'Brien's tactic of recording Winston promising to kill, poison, murder and steal? It seemed effective.

    ReplyDelete
  36. @Inner Circle
    The goal of the torture his to break his resistance. He must be entirely and totally allied with them before he dies, so that there are no martyrs, no one can die for a cause. I think it's also possible that the "bullet to the head" is both literal and figurative. At the very moment when he finally began to love Big Brother, he took a figurative "bullet to the head", and the Winston we knew through out the entirety of the book died. At that moment, Winston is gone, and only a shell of who he was is left. He never could have seen that moment coming, he was "shot in the back of the head".

    ReplyDelete
  37. This situation that Winston went through is extremely similar to Jaycee Dugard's story. Her captor changed her mind to the point where she stopped resisting. It shows that people will break down when put in extreme conditions. The mind can always be changed.

    ReplyDelete
  38. @Reid
    I think that he was so freaked out about the rats that he did not know what else to do. He also was not thinking about what he was saying, just about his situation. I think the only reason that he did not betray Julia earlier is because she was the only person he was semi-happy with and she "supported" him.

    ReplyDelete
  39. @Class
    So do you think with this strong of a government anyone will ever be able to stand against it?

    ReplyDelete
  40. @Class
    Is room 101 the same for everyone, or is it each individuals worst fears?

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Brooke
    It is because he was "cured" that he was okay with it. He loved the government, loved Big Brother, and anything they did was right in his eyes. That was the very point of the torture.

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Rick
    I think that they did that because in their minds the greatest rebellion might be when someone dies hating the government. When Winston was talking about how they kill him, he will die hating the government. But until then he will act as though he loves it. And with the thought of dying hating the government, he was put back in the Ministry of Love to be cured even further. They want everyone to love them.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Class
    O'Brian seems to be making a game out of Winston. His only goal seems to be to make Winston love the government. He is able to change him but i don't think there is a way that someone can't be broken down by physical torture.

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Klarissa:
    I think that the only way to stop this cycle would be to blow up the entire country. I don't think that will ever really happen.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @ Casey
    I totally agree. If Winston and Julia would have truly loved each other, they would have died loving each other, and they would have taken all the pain instead of giving it to the other. The fact that they turned on each other broke my heart, because I thought they finally loved each other and they would stick together until the end.

    ReplyDelete
  46. @Baergen

    Room 101 is specific to each person. For one person it's drowning, for another it's snakes, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  47. @Baergen
    I think it would be more effective for the government to use everyone's individual fears.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @ Rick
    I think that the goal is to not let someone die as a stain on the perfect world of the Party. They didn't want anyone to die unloyal to them. I think it's more of a pride thing.

    ReplyDelete
  49. @Rick
    I think the government tortured him just to torture him- it is so messed up, I think they just figured he was a traitor and danger to the government that he deserved to feel pain and then, just kill him to top it off.

    ReplyDelete
  50. @Baegen
    Room 101 seems to be different for everyone. It gives in the each of the individuals fears. Not everyone would have such a fear of rats as Winston did.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @Baergen
    It is the same, and different. It is the "worst thing in the world" for everyone, but what that means varies from person to person.

    ReplyDelete
  52. @Class
    What do you all think of O'Brien? Was anyone else really confused as to what all his character did and acted towards Winston?

    ReplyDelete
  53. @Baergen

    I think that Room 101 is every ones worst fears. Although, even though rats aren't my worst fear, I would be freaked out if someone put a cage of them up to my face.

    ReplyDelete
  54. @Rick
    I think that the government doesn't kill him because it shows that they are capable of getting what they want and that they are willing to do whatever it takes to stay in power. Also, most of the people wanted to die, but they kept them alive because it was a worse punishment than taking their lives. Big Brother would not want to give them the easy way out.

    ReplyDelete
  55. @Katie
    I really don't think that they would even have a chance to blow up the government. If two people can't even have a relastionship, how in the world would they be able to blow up the government.

    ReplyDelete
  56. @ Klarissa
    I agree with you. Because if they chose only 1 specific torture, it won't have the same or equal affect.

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Brooke I really don’t know what to think of the ending. There is no moral of the story or overall theme. Fahrenheit 451 was a cautionary tale about the dangers of burning books. But I really don’t see the moral in 1984. Orwell is preaching that the government will always win no matter what happens. The government is immortal and cannot be stopped.

    ReplyDelete
  58. @Taylor:
    Do you really think that the government would kill them like that? They don't want to kill them disloyal, so do you think that their fears are just a threat?

    ReplyDelete
  59. @Baergen
    It doesn't make sense that they wouldn't have killed him in the beginning because it doesn't seem like anyone would care. No one would stop and think, wow, big brother is pretty evil. They just live there lives and Winston would go missing unnoticed.

    ReplyDelete
  60. @Arman- In practicallity, there is certain relationships between how the people are treated now and even back then, that they have to be made into "normal" of our society. That there aren't really tortures but there are ways they use to manipulate people.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Class
    O'Brien often was saying that Winston was sick in the mind or had a mental illness. Do you all believe that Winston had a mental illness? Or is his illness having the ability to be able to stand up against the government?

    ReplyDelete
  62. @ Baergen

    I think that it would make sense to do it on and individual basis. It is true that they could figure something out that would terrify most people, but that is a rather inefficient method. It would make more sense to use whatever each individual is most afraid of.

    ReplyDelete
  63. @class - I don't think the brotherhood really exists in the way Winston thought it did. O'Brien claimed to be on Winston's side, then clearly was a part of the party and tortured Winston. He also claimed to have helped write Goldstein's book. What are your thoughts on that?

    ReplyDelete
  64. @Brooke

    Yes. It was not really explained well I don't think. All of a sudden he was thrown in jail and then he turned into the villain of Winston in the ministry of love.

    ReplyDelete
  65. @ inner circle
    I think we overestimate ourselves. I think that we are weaker than we think. We can pretend all we want about how we wouldn't break, but we would. There would be no resisting in the end.

    ReplyDelete
  66. @Michael- I really didn't like the book's ending. I read a lot, and I guess I am used to happy endings, or at least endings where there is some lesson learned for the better. But the ending in 1984 is not for the better at all! I felt like the storyline was building it all up, and I expected something, at least a valiant effort. But no. Winston got caught without actually doing anything. They tortured him. And then he gave up. And that makes it more realistic, I think, but it's not really what people want to read in a story. I was disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  67. @Gabe
    I think it's entirely possible to mentally break someone through torture. After undergoing the worst pain one can possibly imagine, and being faced with your worst fears, it would be very hard not to agree to anything, to grovel and cry and do anything possible to stop the pain. He was so terrified that he sold out a woman that he believed he loved. At that point, there's nothing that he wouldn't have done.

    ReplyDelete
  68. @Joe
    Exactly. They do that to everyone else so why was he different?

    ReplyDelete
  69. @Michael
    I think the point of the book was government control and the individuality of the government. There might not seem to be a specific think that Orwell wrote the book for, but the overall idea was to demonstrate who powerful a government can become.

    ReplyDelete
  70. @ Class
    How do you think Winston lasted in Room 101 so long? I didn't think that his belief was that strong. I thought he was going to come to an end much sooner than he actually did. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  71. @Klarissa:
    I was thinking maybe one of the countries they were at war with could drop a nuclear bomb.

    ReplyDelete
  72. @Brooke
    I think that O'BRien is a huge bully. I was really mad to find out that he was behind this, but on the other hand it didn't surprise me, I kinda figured that something like this was going to happen.

    ReplyDelete
  73. @Rick

    I think the brotherhood doesn't exist. It is a legend designed to trap would-be rebels.

    ReplyDelete
  74. @class-
    The way that the torture is found in every single person in there society is extremely scary. How do you think the society knows everything about everyone? How do they know their fears?

    ReplyDelete
  75. @Michael--I think that is exactly what Orwell wants you to realize. Ultimately, how much power do we allow the government to have. How many things are the average American's oblivious to? To me, it is scary to realize how much we don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  76. @Klarissa
    If all of the people stand together to overthrow the government, then there is a slight chance that they can throw them out. Most of the people are so brainwashed though that there are not enough of sane people to even think about overpowering Big Brother. Plus, no one knows who can be a member of the Thought Police or who is dedicated to the Party.

    ReplyDelete
  77. @Casey
    I think that we would want to resist completely. But when it really comes down to it we couldn't do it. It's like how when we are with our friends I'm sure almost all of us have said these crazy stupid things that we would do but then when we are away we don't actually do anything like that. We want to be stronger than we really are.

    ReplyDelete
  78. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  79. @ inner circle

    The Party and Big Brother want absolute control. Although it doesn't matter, not even a little bit, whether the confessions of a prisoner are true or not, The Party just wants power over people down to the very last molecule in their body. But Winston was right, a prisoner could trick himself into believing what his torturers forced him to believe, but in the last second before death, where there is no more left to lose, the truth will seep out. And it angers the Party into perfecting the art of Brainwashing.

    ReplyDelete
  80. @Rick
    There's no way to know for sure. It might, it might not. It's entirely possible that the government invented it specifically to create more rebels. The party does not appear as strong if there is no enemy. In order to create a world like the one O'Brien described, a world fueled by hate and anger, the must be someone to direct that hate and anger towards.

    ReplyDelete
  81. @Savannah
    Exactly, I think people could then easily overthrough the government. I mean, I really don't think that everyone would be that afraid of rats!

    ReplyDelete
  82. @Elly

    They weren't going to kill Winston. They were always planning to change all of his thoughts to things appropriate for the party and big brother. That way there are more people loyal.

    ReplyDelete
  83. @ inner circle
    My question is, why would Winston and Julia do the exact same thing? Why did they both say that they would have it done to the other person? Earlier in the book, this one man said that he would allow them to slaughter his family in front of him.

    ReplyDelete
  84. @ Elly

    I think that he was remembering everything that he had promised to the brotherhood, but that wasn't enough. He then remembered Julia and how much he loves her, and he's trying to stay strong and not let her get hurt and he just wanted to get back together.

    ReplyDelete
  85. @Class
    Constantly Orwell is mentioning "2+2=5". What is the huge significance of this being said so often?

    ReplyDelete
  86. @Brooke- I thought O'Brien's character was really complex. It was hard to tell if he was on Winston's side or not. One thing that O'Brien said, on page 238, "They got me a long time ago," made me think that he was actually on the government's side. Maybe he used to be like Winston, but the government got him and now he fights for the government- while feeling empathy for Winston. But maybe he is just trying to protect the Brotherhood when he tortures Winston. I think that Orwell wanted us to think about it.

    ReplyDelete
  87. @class - on page 242, Winston talks about confessing everything; he even flat out lies saying he had been a spy in the Eastasian government since 1968! If the party knew everything, what is the point of Winston's false confessions.

    ReplyDelete
  88. I know this is a terrible thing to say, but I think Room 101 is a genious idea. If you want to get into someone's head or get them to confess something, I think that putting them against their biggest fear is the best solution. I actually believe that fear is worse than physical torture.

    ReplyDelete
  89. @ inner circle
    Have you actually been to each and every border in the U.S.? There is no way of knowing for sure whether everything we've been told is really true.

    ReplyDelete
  90. @Brooke

    It's the perfect example of the government's control over the people. If they can say 2+2=5 and people believe it, they have absolute control.

    ReplyDelete
  91. @Brooke-
    The understanding of 2+2=5 is an intriguing point brought up by the author, that in their society they control every solution and everyway somebody thinks. That they have no free will with something that makes no sense

    ReplyDelete
  92. @ Blake

    I think that it's all brainwashing and belief. There are many things that people just say they are afraid of without actually knowing whether or not they really are. They just go with what Big Brother says and what keeps them alive and out of trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  93. @Blake
    I think its beacause everyone is so brainwashed, that they really don't even know what they really are afraid of. They also probably know because of all the thought police. They are constantly being watched.

    ReplyDelete
  94. @Rick
    The government wants a victory so they will cure him and then kill so it isn't a waste. Maybe they feel less guilty by helping him and then disposing of him.

    ReplyDelete
  95. @Blake
    The telescreans monitor everything. They can watch whatever they want so they know exactly how everyone acys around certain things.

    ReplyDelete
  96. @Brooke
    I think that the significance is that this government is so powerful and has such a strong hold on everyone that they can change a persons mind. 2+2=4 is something that someone would think that they know for sure, but the government has the power to change that.

    ReplyDelete
  97. @Brooke:
    I think that it is kind of saying that we only believe what we are told. 2+2=5 is just a representation. Numbers are not real. So, in theory. 2+2 COULD be 5. We don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  98. @Casey
    I think it's because they are all to weak to take the pain themselves. They want all the pain to be on everyone but them. They are completely selfish. It's just as Julia was saying in her speech when her and Winston met again after the Ministry of Love.

    ReplyDelete
  99. @Brooke
    I think that the significance is that "2+2=4" is a basic fact that all kids learn at a young age. If the government can change something as basic as that, what's to stop them from controlling everything else?

    ReplyDelete
  100. The Party talks about how reality is comprised of only the mind of the person. In a sense, they're correct. Perception is reality. After WWII, and after the Nazis killed millions, some Germans went on, completely denying the events, and absolutely believing that the Holocaust never happened. But two things keep the legacy of the Holocaust alive. Those who acknowledge it, and the physical evidence. Both of which The Party in the book attempted to eradicate, any reality outside of the mind, outside of what reality they created.

    ReplyDelete
  101. @Brooke
    I think he is trying to prove his power!

    ReplyDelete
  102. @Brooke

    I think that O'Brien was like an undercover agent. If you think about it, he had recordings of his and Winston's conversation when Winston joined the Brotherhood. He could have easily started to record their conversation when he 'turned off' the telescreen. O'Brien also had everything that he needed. He found out where Winston and Julia's 'hideout' was. It would have been easy for O'Brien to put the telescreen into the room.

    ReplyDelete
  103. @ Elly
    That's true. Fear can eat you alive. It's the worst thing you could ever experince, in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  104. @Brooke - I think the math problem is said again and again because it is something that is seemingly so basic, and so obvious. Yet the government is saying that 2+2 doesn't equal 4, and if they can do that, then they can change anything.

    ReplyDelete
  105. @Arman-
    You bring up a good point, that these people honestly are just trying to stay alive and not really thinking about what scares them, but what will actually happen to them at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  106. @Blake- I don't necessarily think that the government knows EVERYONE'S fears and thoughts. I think they have gotten really good at knowing certain people's fears and thoughts, and they make examples of them. They choose the people and execute the punishments,and they are fantastic at doing it in such a way that others are afraid to do anything about it.

    ReplyDelete
  107. @Class
    It's not about whether things are real or not. Its about how the government got people to believe certain things. It is about power and how no one questions it.

    ReplyDelete
  108. @ Elly
    I don't think that it's a horrible thing to say. the atomic bomb wasn't a "peacful" option and it wasn't meant to be a good undestructive tool. I agree that it's a genuis type of idea. That doesn't mean inventions or ideas are supposed to be a positive outcome.

    ReplyDelete
  109. @Rick
    The government just likes to hear how much control they have over the people. Over time, they can make everyone think about whatever they choose.

    ReplyDelete
  110. @ inner cirlce
    Perhaps they are trying to deflect the true religion in the world, which is the religion of Big Brother.

    ReplyDelete
  111. @Elly
    I think you're absolutely right. It was the pure terror itself that finally got him to betray Julia. I think it was that fear that finally broke him down to the point that they wished him to get to.

    ReplyDelete
  112. @Class
    Do you think that Big Brother exists as an actual person or is he just a symbol?

    ReplyDelete
  113. @Rick I think the Brotherhood is the scapegoat for The Party. The Brotherhood is the yin to The Party’s yang. They are fire and ice. As long as The Party exists The Brotherhood will exist. The Party uses The Brotherhood as a way to prove that they are right. The Brotherhood won’t go away because The Party needs them as the way to show how powerful the government is. It weird to say but the two parties need each other.

    ReplyDelete
  114. @ Class

    When Winston stepped in front of the mirror, it was the final conformation that 1984 mirrored WWII. The body that Winston described as his own, was what the body of a Jewish person from a concentration camp would be like. Class, what other examples, other connections are there in the book to WWII?

    ReplyDelete
  115. @Joe

    It's like "spoon feeding" from history class. The government is so powerful, that people just blindly follow it.

    ReplyDelete
  116. In torture chambers in Europe from the early times the had tools to make the innocent confess or be killed or if you confessed you would still be killed. However people thought if they confessed they would be let free unharmed. Winston probably thought the same thing.

    ReplyDelete
  117. @Brooke
    I definitely think that he is a symbol.

    ReplyDelete
  118. @Brooke:
    I think he is a concept. I think he IS the party. I think that every person in the party is a little part of big brother.

    ReplyDelete
  119. @Heidi
    You are so right in saying that perception is reality. When you are living in a place like Winston is, there is no person to say anything bad to about your government except the government, and that is different than in Hitler's time because then the Jews had places like America to go to and tell what was going on. But for Winston, if the government doesnt want anything getting out, they will do what they have to to silence him and make sure no one ever finds out.

    ReplyDelete
  120. @Heidi

    Winston does nothing but drink gin all day. When soldiers came back, a lot of them became alcoholics because of PTSD.

    ReplyDelete
  121. @Blake
    I think overall, people may have individual fears, but generally they are all afraid of the same thing, the government. I think that it all boils down to the same thing.

    ReplyDelete
  122. @Baergen
    What makes you think that he is a symbol? I agree that he is just a symbol though.

    ReplyDelete
  123. @ Blake
    I agree that it is extremely scary, but I think it is easy for them to figure out what everyone's fear is. There are telescreens everywhere. Because the people are monitored all the time, it is easy for the telescreens to eventually figure out everyon's fear.

    ReplyDelete
  124. @Heidi

    I think that that is a very good point. If someone already doubts something, and the only thing making them believe it is solid evidence is suddenly gone, what is left to believe in that thing anymore?

    ReplyDelete
  125. @Heidi
    That is very true. As long as there is no evidence there is no past... To the present mind. We don't have concrete evidence on how the dinasours acted but we do know how Columbus got to the Americas. Through documentation.

    ReplyDelete
  126. @Willie
    You are exactly right.Except in history we are aloud to break our spoons and challenge the system. Big Brother would not allow you to break the spoon. You must follow him or be punished.

    ReplyDelete
  127. @Willie
    That is very true. Its hard to imagine people completely following the government because it seems obviously wrong. But it has happened in the past many times, so how do we know that it won't happen again?

    ReplyDelete
  128. @Heidi-
    There's a lot of symbolization off of the way a single leader seems like a genius and they want to follow him, like many thought about Hitler at the time, and still makes people think that there are superior races in the world, like they thought about themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  129. @ class
    Could you imagine being sentenced to death, and then trying to move faster toward it? To want to "fix" your mind quicker so that death will come all the more quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  130. @Heidi - I agree with your comparison from Winston's experience in the Ministry of Love to the Holocaust, but the Jewish were forced to work for the government or killed. In this story, it's as if the Germans transformed the Jews into people of their perfect race.

    ReplyDelete
  131. @Inner Circle:
    I HATE Julia. She is a horrible person. She's too vain. She never loved Winston. She just used him.

    ReplyDelete
  132. The Party can change anything because they control the minds of the people. The world is all about perception and suggestion. If the people believe is then it will be. That is how The Party controls the people through changing their perception and telling them what to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  133. @Class
    Like Julia, I think we have all said big things and talked big talks, but are in the end realize we just aren't strong enough.

    ReplyDelete
  134. @Heidi
    I think that's an excellent connection. In my opinion, reality exists in both the mind and the physical world. There are some things we can't deny. I am typing this on a laptop, the laptop is sitting on a table. However, there are some realities that I can create and make true, simply by convincing myself of them. I could tell myself that this laptop is out to get me, and convince myself that it is true. I could create my own new faith, or tell myself that no one in this class is real. In that sense, reality can be both physical and mental.

    ReplyDelete
  135. @ inner circle
    I think it's crazy that someone would try to inflict pain on someone else just to prevent yourself from looking ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  136. @Casey
    I think its because they all just want the torture to end. When you have something terrible going on in your life, don't you just want that terrible thing to end as fast as possible? Imagine if that was your whole life...It's hard to warp your mind around.

    ReplyDelete
  137. @Brooke
    I think that Big Brother is an idea as a way to control the people. It might have started out as one person, but for Big Brother to be effective more people would have to be involved. So I think Big Brother just turned into a symbol of the government.

    ReplyDelete
  138. @Casey
    I could not imagine it. It seems impossible. If I knew I was going to die I would loose it, and give up. I wouldn't try to fix myself for the government if they were going to kill me anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  139. @Joe

    In 1984, you are simply tortured to the point of where you no longer want to break the spoon. Then given another spoon. Are the pushups and lack of cookies "torture"?

    ReplyDelete
  140. @Casey

    I think that if I were in the same position that Winston was in I would probably do the same thing. He was being tortured, and from what was described, I would want it all to end in one way or another.

    ReplyDelete
  141. @ Class
    If the telescreen in Winston and Julia's room hadn't have heard about Winston's fear of rats and Julia's love of beauty, do you think that the thought police would have had to wait longer to capture them? If they hadn't of known Winston and Julia's fear, they wouldn't know what to torture them with in Room 101. Do you think another way to keep from being captured by the thought police is to not let them know your biggest fear?

    ReplyDelete
  142. @Class- Do you guys think that when George Orwell wrote 1984, he was writing it as a warning? Or do you think that he was writing it just as a story?

    Personally, I think he was trying to give the world a warning about where they were heading. The ending is too sad for just a story...

    ReplyDelete
  143. @Class
    Do you think the Brotherhood actually exists?

    ReplyDelete
  144. @Class
    I think they did not kill them because they wanted to use them as an example. If I saw Julia on the street with the scars on her face, I would not dare challenge Big Brother.

    ReplyDelete
  145. @Kate
    Well can there really be a perfect person in this society? Julia was just trying to live a life similar to before Big Brother and becuase of all the restrictions and reprocusions she wasn't able to. She isn't necesarily a terrible person she was just trying to be free.

    ReplyDelete
  146. @Class
    The inner circle has been talking about Julia a lot, what do you all think about this character?

    ReplyDelete
  147. @ Eliza
    And yet, are your eyes betraying you? Are you sure that you feel your fingers typing on the laptop? How do you know that you aren't lying on a lab table, giving these feelings by a simulator or something?

    ReplyDelete
  148. @Reid

    It doesn't exist. The party made it up to catch would-be rebels.

    ReplyDelete
  149. @Reid
    Hard to know for sure, but I would sa yes. I just tend to think that there is.

    ReplyDelete
  150. @ Klarissa

    That is true, although today, we all try hard to only say and promise what we know we can pull of, only pushing the boundaries. I have much respect for those who, like Winston, talk big, but it is very important that they also come through on what they say, which is where Winston falls back.

    ReplyDelete
  151. @Emma:
    Honestly, I'm not sure. I think it is probably a warning, but it also might be a really messed up story.

    ReplyDelete
  152. @Willie
    Yes it is torture. She wants to see how serious we are about challenging the system. Also to see how far we would go for the rewards.

    ReplyDelete
  153. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  154. @Joe - I don't think they wanted to use him as an example, because no one will ever know they existed. They will have no legacy, so I don't see what good the extreme torture would be in showing the world an example.

    ReplyDelete
  155. @inner circle

    Do you guys think that Winston really believes what he is telling himself? 2+2=5? That he loves Big Brother?

    ReplyDelete
  156. @Emma-
    I think that he did insist that there would be something significant that would happen, because already we are starting to think and act as they are in their society, that we are kind of constrained to think in a certain way.

    ReplyDelete
  157. @ class
    In the part of the book when Winston was nursing himself back to health, why do you think he bothered? Why did he try to get his strength back when he knew that death was coming?

    ReplyDelete
  158. @Joe
    Would you know that those scars are becuase of Big Brother though? They made such a great image of themselves that people wouldn't automatically asume it was big brother. If you saw someone with a scarred face oon the street today would you just asume it was our government? Would you asume it was in a war or just an accident?

    ReplyDelete
  159. @Willie
    But I still think that the possibility for the brotherhood does exsist. I mean, I think that if we precieve things only one way, we will never understand. What if the government truly even didn't exsist. How can you trust anything, let alone yourself in a society like this.

    ReplyDelete
  160. @ Inner circle

    Big Brother is God. Albeit the bad version. God is the idea of love, to me at least, and he will never die because he is an idea. And no matter what happens to a person who carries the idea, it will still live on (V for Vendetta, anyone?) Big Brother will never die as long as he has those who follow him, who believe in his ideas (The Party), who remember him. Hitler now lives in immortality, despite negative connotations, because we won't forget his ideas and his legacy (even though we find him and his actions repulsive.)

    ReplyDelete
  161. @Klarrissa
    I Think it exists aswell, however the Brotherhood, Winston was in was irrevelant.

    ReplyDelete
  162. @inner circle

    I think that he wished the Proles would do something. But the Proles were just content with how life was.

    ReplyDelete
  163. @Toni
    I think that in the very end of the book, Winston really believes that he loves Big Brother. I don't get quite why he loves Big Brother now that they just won a war or on the road to winning. Winston wants to believe that he loves Big Brother but in the end when he is going to die or get shot, his last few moments, he really might die hating Big Brother.

    ReplyDelete
  164. @Klarissa

    If the brotherhood does exist, it's very lazy. What have they done to bring down the party?

    ReplyDelete
  165. @Michael:
    That is a messed up moral. Do what you're told? What kind of moral is that? Really!

    ReplyDelete
  166. @ inner circle
    Did you read the ending words? At the back, it said that this book was meant to be a warning of what is to come.

    ReplyDelete
  167. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  168. @Arman
    Yes, I don't think that making a promise to yourself to do something like that is wise. In Winston's case, he really didn't understand the extremes that the government would go to stop him, so I don't think he should have ever made that kind of a promise to himself.

    ReplyDelete
  169. @Katie

    If it keeps you from being tortured, you'd follow that moral also.

    ReplyDelete
  170. @Gabe
    That's a good point. You would have to know his story. And as Rick said, nobody will know. No one will realize whate happened to Julia and Winston.

    ReplyDelete
  171. @ Rick

    Yes, but Orwell was not attempting to show exactly what happened in WWII, just the horrors of the Holocaust and the power-driven, vicious, disturbing motives and actions of the Nazis

    ReplyDelete
  172. I thought it was interesting that in the end, Winston never did die. He was 'doomed', he was going to be shot in the head, but it never happened. He never did die. Although, I will say he seemed to die morally, but not physically like he expected.

    ReplyDelete
  173. @Inner Circle
    I think Taylor's point is basically the same as Micheal's. Taylor just believes that the individual has to ban together. But, Micheal is saying the INDIVIDUAL alone cannot change anything. Taylor just beleives that those individuals can join together to change things. Taylor is just looking at a more broad individuality. Individuality in a group...

    ReplyDelete
  174. @Willie
    True, but there is always still the possiblity of it. As much power as the government has, I think that people could still have the power to overthrow it. I don't know, I still agree with you that the fact that they would be pretty lazy then.

    ReplyDelete
  175. @INNER CIRCLE
    The story was cautionary. It was his idea of what life was going to be like in 1984. It could be a warning that if totalinarianism continued, the world would end up like this form of unthought system.

    ReplyDelete